Effective Workplace Participation Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss the Case Study of Dave Armstron. Answer: Introduction The case study is about Dave Armstrong. He is a 29 year old MBA second year student and hails from Dumas, Texas. He graduated from Liberal Arts College in Texas and worked as a computer programmer for Thorne enterprises in Austin. He became president of a conveyor belt scales on his performance within 6 months but he left the job because the sale of belt was not increasing. So his join life insurance Company where he used to get $60000 annually and worked for 5 years and his life was comfortable but he left the job because he was only dedicated towards his work and in his absence the work used to get stop. So he applied to Harvard Business School randomly to pursue management course because he has not planned for future as if he could get selected then what he was going to do and finally he was selected and he decided to go as he would be getting income from his old policy holders but as of now he is 3 months from his graduation and concerned about future as what he should do next to earn his living. Literature review Career management is the integration of strategy as how to plan the career and actively manage the preferred professional career of an individual. Career is a planned process in which a person plans his/her career from the initial stage of his/her life(Alessandri, Borgogni, Latham, 2016). The planning starts from the school and step by step the individual plans his career and when he grows and reaches to higher classes then he has to pick a particular subject which interest him and in which he is good like science, commerce or arts. According to his/her choice they opt for college for graduation and then if they are willing to study more they do post graduate. Career is basically a professional word for earning living in terms of money by working through building specialized skills(Cakmur, 2011). Career constitute of goals and ambition by an individual of what they want to become in life and to get successful by attaining a good standard of living and to chase their dream. An indivi dual pursue his career for employment purpose so that he could earn his living. Career is an inclusion goals, ambition, objectives, making of plans, developing of specific traits like policy, rules and regulations, process and activity and also the calculation of the progress of an individual in the field of organization by attaining certain objectives and goals of the firm(Denning, 1998). Career includes short term goals which extends from one year to two years, middle term goals ranging from 3 to 20 years and long term goals over 20 years. Career planning is very important in an individual life as it shows path to an individual to direct his work systematically. While planning for career an individual should have clear ideas and thoughts to frame his work. Career gives an individual the true meaning of his life as it makes him worthy in the society(Denning, 1998). To develop a career an individual should have good and correct guidance by a mentor who do self assessment for that in dividual and also good counseling of him and also the individual receive hands on experience from his guide(Frege, 2002). Career develops practical knowledge of an individual as he develop knowledge and information for a particular subject and develop skills of an individual in a particular field and the individual is capable of getting selected for a job and delegate his duties in his area of work(Gruneberg, 2014). Career developing can land an individual in making a successful life by commencing business after he develops his skills in his area of work as then he could open up his own business and run according to his own will. Networking in management is the chain of continuation of exchanging of information. Information is the collection of raw data. It is a type of business opportunity that is very famous with people opting for part time work(HAN, 2008). Networking basically took place on internet where a user has a pc or a Smartphone and he communicates with different people for business purpose. A network manager prepares report in the field of networking by considering various parameters of the work flow. He evaluates the work force; prepare ppt on network management, interaction with employees by delegating them their desired duties(Hedge, Borman, Lammlein, 2006). The network manager utilizes the best process of technology to evaluate his work. Networking also means channelizing the work to different departments of heads like connecting with sales department to production department to get the feedback. Manager often develop networking business for promotion of the business by interaction with diffe rent entrepreneur to get the business deal done. The company hire network expert to train their employees so that they could develop their skills on networking field to connect globally and to expand the business and make it multinational companies(Hirsch, Hirsch, 2004). The success of big companies lies in good networking as they succeed in developing contacts with other businessman to expand their business. Networking also aids in bringing innovative ideas and connect different classes of people and with their difference in culture. Networking aids mostly to customers as they could provide their feedback on a particular product which they use by writing their comments and providing their opinions in the companys portal(Luff, Hindmarsh, Heath, 2011). Networking also facilitate in providing good services to the customers as different heads are connected with networking and it takes less time to deliver a product to the customers. Networking also helps in checking the inventories o f the factories and also facilitates prompt delivery of products to the customers and it also aids in reducing wastage of goods as it takes into account the correct requirement of the products(Nightingale, 2016). Networking also helps in advertising of a product and promotion of it through various medium like TV, radio, newspaper. So networking is a very vast process in management as it facilitate the growth of business and it is the main nodes of an organization as it helps in carrying the day to day business and helps in smooth flow of the business as the aim of the business is to run forever so networking is very important in managing the day to day trade(Pettinger, 2002). Case study Recommendations Dave Armstrong is a 29 year old MBA student who has three career options in his hand. While all three options provide him with lucrative prospects, he is unable to decide which one to opt for. Now what we must understand here is that while the three prospects are all related to what Dave needs to do in the future, we must take into account the fact that they are different in their respective natures(PINCUS, 1986). The first one is an opportunity that is provided to him by Mr. Thorne, the second by Mr Irwin and the third is an offer from a pension fund management company in Houston. However, what is to be noted is that Dave needs to select a job that provides him with the maximum level of satisfaction. The first prospect is an opportunity that Dave views as a great opportunity. From what can be seen in the case study, Dave says that it was his dream to be working as a software developer. The second prospect however, is lucrative on a monetary basis. This is one where Dave stands a cha nce of making a huge amount of money. However, there is a risk(Sell, Cleal, 2011). The risk is that Dave only gets one opportunity to make it big. However, from what can be seen and what has been mentioned by Dave, this opportunity would only last for a limited period of time and it Dave would only get one chance at making it big. What he does with the money is not our concern but Dave stands a chance to make a huge amount of money in a single shot(Shandler, 2009). The third is a conventional job that guarantees security. From what can be seen from these options, and what we come to know of Dave from the case study, we can say that Daves best choice would be to opt for the first option. This is because, if we utilize the theory of workforce motivation, it becomes extremely clear that Dave likes the kind of work that the first option offers. This would lead him to providing a greater effort thus providing a better output. However, in the second option, money can be seen to be a moti vational factor. But we cannot consider to be a viable option as it contains extremely high risks(ZIEGLER, HAGEN, DIEHL, 2012). This rules out the possibility of choosing the second option as something to consider. Although the second option provides the opportunity of earning a huge amount of money, it is to be noted that Dave is not motivated by the work itself. This would not work in Daves favour as such a situation would lead him more towards failure than success. As a result, it is once again not an effective choice. When we take into account the final option, we can see clearly why it is not a viable option. While the job is a secure one, it is to be noted that it does not motivate Dave to a huge extent. This is particularly important to be taken into account as this means that Dave would not be an effective employee in this organization. While the job provides him security, it does not provide him with any sort of satisfaction. As a result, Dave would not work in this case t o his utmost potential. From a comparison between the three choices that Dave has in his hands, it is evident that the first option is the best choice for Dave. From what we have in the case study, the primary aim in this case is for Dave to be happy. As a result, we have to select the one choice that makes him happy. Workforce motivation is the primary aim that we focus on in this case. From an assessment of the options that Dave has in his hands, the first option has the maximum potential for him to succeed. The first option gives him something like an objective. The first option is what can be seen to be fulfilling his expectation to the utmost level. As a result, the first option is the best choice for Dave. Conclusion Dave would do his best if he chooses the first option. The first option provides him with all the tools necessary to succeed in any endeavour. The second and the third have varying attractiveness and motivational factors. While the second kind of job is one where money works as a motivational factor, the third is one where there is a kind of security. However, when we take into account, these factors are useless in this case as Dave would basically lack any job satisfaction in these cases. While the second option does not guarantee any security, the second does not seem to be exciting in any manner. Hence, Dave would not prefer any of those two options. These two options would not provide any kind of job satisfaction which in turn would lead to lower productivity on the part of Dave. Dave himself mentions that he had always wished to be making a computer application which is what he gets to do in the first case. As a result, he should definitely opt for the first option. The first op tion would provide Dave with the optimum level of Job satisfaction which would help him, give an effective output. As a result, it would not only help him become a better employee, but also help him to brush up his own skills. Hence, Dave should choose the first option as his choice for a job References Alessandri, G., Borgogni, L., Latham, G. (2016). A Dynamic Model of the Longitudinal Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Supervisor-Rated Job Performance.Applied Psychology,66(2), 207-232. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apps.12091 Cakmur, H. (2011). Concept and Evaluation of Job Satisfaction: Developed Job Satisfaction Index.TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin,10(6), 759. https://dx.doi.org/10.5455/pmb.20111018014747 Denning, S. (1998).The practice of workplace participation. Westport, Conn. [u.a.]: Quorum. Frege, C. (2002).Social partnership at work. London: Routledge. Gruneberg, M. (2014).Understanding job satisfaction. [Place of publication not identified]: Palgrave Macmillan. HAN, Y. (2008). The Relationship between Job Performance and Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Goal Orientation.Acta Psychologica Sinica,40(1), 84-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2008.00084 Hedge, J., Borman, W., Lammlein, S. (2006).The aging workforce. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Hirsch, A., Hirsch, A. (2004).How to be happy at work. Indianapolis, IN: JIST Works. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C. (2011).Workplace Studies. Cambridge, GBR: Cambridge University Press. Nightingale, D. (2016).Workplace Democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Pettinger, R. (2002).Managing the flexible workforce. Oxford, U.K.: Capstone Pub. PINCUS, J. (1986). COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION, JOB SATISFACTION, AND JOB PERFORMANCE.Human Communication Research,12(3), 395-419. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00084.x Sell, L., Cleal, B. (2011). Job Satisfaction, Work Environment, and Rewards: Motivational Theory Revisited.LABOUR,25(1), 1-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9914.2010.00496.x Shandler, D. (2009).Motivating the millennial knowledge worker. [Place of publication not identified]: Axzo Press. ZIEGLER, R., HAGEN, B., DIEHL, M. (2012). Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: Job Ambivalence as a Moderator.Journal Of Applied Social Psychology,42(8), 2019-2040. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00929.x